<\/span><\/h1>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.swisswuff.ch\/images\/prostheticsproject\/pp7a.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
I will welcome harness redesign.<\/p>\n
But the tricky problem of the harness is its pressure on brachial plexus portions and infliction of “double crush” injury which is my problem right now as well – plexus compression facilitates carpal tunnel syndrome. Hence the term “double” crush.<\/p>\n
A shoulder harness thus should allow for forces to be generated by using body parts whose compression does not cause long term problems. This – what we see here – is not such as shoulder harness.<\/p>\n
The problem area of compression is at the anterior shoulder above the shoulder crease. There, strap design is problematic.<\/p>\n
But if you don’t know the problem, you cannot solve it.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.swisswuff.ch\/images\/prostheticsproject\/pp7b.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
<\/span>Their suggestion for OPP web redesign<\/span><\/h1>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.swisswuff.ch\/images\/prostheticsproject\/pp8a.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
“Can a disability become an enviable situation”? I have not seen less qualified statements than this. This is below any standard. Why are there no useful subjects on this mock-up anyway? Why is it filled with silly ideas and unrealistic visions? Where are the good things that we want and need from investigative journalism, artistry or engineering? Why is the T-hook mentioned there when in fact there is a modern product that supersedes the T-hook? Is it hard to know which product? Why don’t you know?<\/p>\n
Why is it that people write “prosthetics” over their projects that deal with arm prostheses and yet, they lack understanding just ever so completely? No deep seeded humor, no wit, not a hint of subtle understanding – why? The “Greasy Spoon” exhibit by Brian Walker<\/a> nailed it at once – where this project just sailed past so many points. Why? What is it with these people?<\/p>\nOK, we won’t tell : )<\/p>\n\n