Open Bionics Hero Arm [considerations from another angle]
I did get a request to provide an extensive opinion about the Open Bionics Hero Arm.
As I am a below elbow amputee and what you would call extreme user far out and beyond (the wording is used to denote that prosthetic industries do not cover this usually: I am a normal forensic pathologist and specialist for clinical forensic medicine), my work exposure is in the far upper end of the range of physical loading inasmuch as the possibilities of existing prosthetic components is concerned. As that, I have considerable experience that you can also read up in our (free : ) scientific article about just that: https://jneuroengrehab.
Review of the Hero arm technology and video:
The choice of Open Bionics to build a myoelectric rather than body powered arm sadly is not good. Myo arms are ladden with inherent and very serious control problems so unfortunately they are not really fit for a truly reliable everyday use even when leading a rather sedentary life. See the article [link]. Myoelectric control remained an empty promise, in terms of improved reliability, ever since its invention in the fourties and fifties. In fact, four decades of myoelectric control research only produced a stalled level of unacceptably high myoelectric control rate errors (link). There, unfortunately, not even a victory of tenacity over intelligence resulted, as signal wise, you get only "garbage out" if all you get is "garbage in". That was as true fifty years ago, which was when some clever researchers voiced that for some of the first times.
The socket style the Hero arm has is a Munster type socket, where the material fixes to the arm by slightly squeezing the arm above the elbow. It unfortunately only repeatedly fits on the arm if the stump has the same volume always, whereas a "fit" means that the shape of the socket exactly matches the shape of the arm. I once had such a socket for my myoelectric arm and I was not lucky: my stump either was too small, arm a bit shrunken, on days where I was a bit dehydrated or cold maybe, and sometimes a bit large, arm a bit difficult to get in, on other days. If the stump is too small, shrunken, the electrodes may not get contact to the skin at all, and I had days when the myoelectric arm just would not work, like, at all. With a swollen arm, electrodes do not only make contact but quite possibly, they may press into the skin with added pressure and possibly cause a bit of friction, imprinting, abrasion, there, depending on specifics. The prosthetic socket caused painful, heavy bruising on my elbow when I took it shopping, to carry grocery baskets, so the socket style of the Hero arm is a problem, that, as the socket style itself, is not particularly new. Any myoelectric prosthesis' socket has the difficult task to keep the electrodes firmly on the skin always, which is why it is important to have a socket that always truly fits the stump, i.e., it is neither too large nor too narrow. In addition, with a conical stump and a socket as shown in the Hero arm video (or in any other video with that type of socket) the force required to pull the arm just a tad bit off the elbow or stump is so little, that it loses electrode skin contact all the time. There are moments in the video where one can see the socket coming off the arm at the slightest touch. You may not be able to even take a full regular trash bag (35 l and a few kilograms of weight) out with such an arm. Mine slipped off my arm far too often. That is one of the reasons why I stopped using my iLimb socket and we moved to a totally different setup (liner, magnet electrodes). We are still trouble shooting that though.
The Open Bionics Hero arm comes off and back on so easily that it is clear that one cannot carry even a light shopping basket with it - it will lose electric contact to the skin first and then fall off entirely shortly afterwards. This type of socket from my experience is almost absolutely useless for real work and real life. But a utilitarian perspective may be lost on this beauty of 3D printed cosmetic cover design. Just for 5000 GBP plus covers maybe, it is still a very expensive toy.
The hand appears to have very fragile fingers, where one wonders why exactly they could not be more robust.
We build our own 3D objects and devices - totally different scale and application - that we use on our deployments or for investigations. We develop and test and improve the designs until they are ready to real use. And from here, the joints of these fingers look like not even a Beta but early Alpha type development. Just wondering why the development had to stop there.
The most important aspect about everyday prosthetic gripping in my view is that the hand or hook has a very predictable grip geometry. An iLimb does not have that, to make a commercial example - the swiveling thumb swivels automatically or inadvertently, and that has caused significant problems. Check these links (1,2) for some Cybathlon analyses and the grip issues of multi-articulated hands are explained in all detail. They did not fix that until today. The main issue is that a prosthesis needs to bring what I do not have when not wearing one: as arm amputee with below elbow amputation on the right side, I have a very useful "power grip" or "cylinder grip" that I approximate with the stump / elbow. I do not need a prosthetic hand for that. Where I really depend on the device is for the precision grip: where thumb meets index finger tip. The best device to deliver that, as little elegance as it has, is the prosthetic hook. It always places the tips together, regardless of how many times I open and close it and regardless of what I touch, push against or do. Not so the multi-articulated hands - they have swiveling thumbs as some type of feature for reasons I have not yet fully understood. But ultimately, the rounded finger tips make it almost impossible to reliably plan a precision grip, and a swiveling thumb can seriously worsen that. So the degree of coordination and the grip surface geometry are absolutely crucial here. Before considering an Open Hero arm and spending any money on one, that needs to seriously be considered.
The wrist is usually an extremely critical point in that it needs to be both mechanically very stable and electrically functional. Otto Bock wrists usually die once one starts to halfway use the prosthesis. So the stability would actually need to be examined physically. I could not tell from the videos.
By and large, they build prosthetic arms that are definitely not for what I call real use. They build temporary plastic things that are far from sustainable in terms of rehabilitation. If anything, they look great. The looks can be easily customized by 3D- printing some other shape or spray coating it with different colors. But then, I spray coated my real body powered arms too, so having fun with looks is not restricted to Hero Arms, they maybe just want to make it look that way.
The 3D design part is something I know well and regard differently. From my view and experience, we use 3D design and printing to only develop a particular shape or model, part or piece. Once we have that, the question is always what we use as material for the final product. I currently am building a special belt buckle, with a 3D extruded logo, great design, but once the plastic 3D printed version fits the belt and works, I will get it done in metal. And the same goes for other parts we build and use. Some 3D designed parts will have to be made from high definition acrylic, others are cool with cheap 3D printed PLA.
A hand that has plastic fingers will not have a great grip. Hard plastic really sucks unless all you do is swap bed sheets. So you want to wear a glove with ample padding. Soft gloves with some padding greatly enhance the grip of a prosthetic hand, even a hook - I wear silicone tubing on my hook fingers if I need to handle a lot of hard objects. For my Becker Mechanical hand, I used various hardware store derived materials - car cleaning leather, rubbery sheet stuff, tapes - to pad the hand before putting on the glove and without surprise: insane grip, great. Also, a glove is a really sensible step to using a prosthetic hand in real life - I would suggest to perform a CT scan of an Open Bionics hand, then take it to (manual) pizza eating, then wipe it off or wash it (it does not mind immersion and tap water, we surely will find out then) and then perform another CT scan to see where we have remnants of pizza. Yech. My Becker hand would accumulate considerable amounts of Pizza Margeritha left overs, stuck in various finger joint mechanism parts, clearly illustrating the real need for a protective glove. Also, gloves get really dirty over time, accumulate dirt and damage, need to be swapped. And there, the only way to not make users really mad with having the prosthetic hand require a glove is to design the hand so a normal, human type glove fits. The kind of glove we get around the corner. The stuff we can buy ourselves for little money. The only hand that I know of that has that is the Becker Mechanical hand: that one works with any type of ~size 8 to 9 gardening glove, package handling glove or other type of work glove you can get for a few bucks and that is absolutely great. All myoelectric hands seem to require special shapes for gloves and as these have to be custom made they are insanely expensive. A glove for an iLimb costs some 200 (thin, cheap, dies within minutes) to 700 USD, and it stays intact for not more than 10 minutes of holding the water hose while car washing, I tried, I know. So glove, cover, padding, that is a really relevant subject. Now, a prosthetic hand that is very light as the Hero Arm apparently is usually has a relatively weak motor. Gloves however require extra force just to move the glove, and the thicker the glove or under material, the better the padding and the better the form closure and grip, so you do not want a really weak motor once you want to wear the hand to reliably hold hard objects such as a wine glass for a reception, a hammer for building something. I have no idea what they really use these Hero Arms for but the plastic finger / glove aspect is relevant.
They show a bike riding sequence in their video. That, I would never do. The socket is definitely not safe for pull forces. The myoelectric control stops working once you sweat. We ride bikes seriously, and extensively, we have both road and mountain bikes at home, spent a few weeks doing alpine bike tours this year, and to advertise bike riding in a video for that type of prosthesis is a bit like claiming you can hop on the moon wearing just a bikini.
For safe and comfortable riding, shift of sitting position while riding is relevant. For that, you need a totally different arm. Check my approach for modifying a Colnago road bike for real use here [link].
Ultimately these are anything but they are not rehabilitation devices and not what I call functional devices. You cannot really use it to ride a bike, or reliably vacuum the house, or carry a grocery basket. Functionally, this is neither new, nor good, nor ground breaking in any way. Production wise, it is not really new either - all companies have some type of 3D design for their molds to cast plastic, or whatever type of build they perform. The question is not whether the large prosthetic companies have these designs - they all do; question is whether they offer scaled, bespoke models of their designs. And there, cost comes into play. Hell, I talked Centri into making me red rather than skin colored "cosmetic" gloves and knowing how technology really works, that cost me nothing more - just shove red rather than pink pellets into the PVC casting machine.
So while these devices appear to be not actually too functional, that may not at all be a problem: some amputees have never gone past a level of relative manual inactivity, and then, such an arm may be a great gift. I like their designs, they look great. The photo and video poses that we have been shown are absolutely fabulous. They are more of an enactment than they are a manual proof of physical real work though, and as I feel over the years that it is the hard and heavy, and/or repetitive work where I need the prosthesis most, there is no room for enactment or role play type prostheses here. Not from my very experienced applied rehabilitative view point.
One my have to consider also that the users will mostly be kids, or adolescents, that may wear this for a day or two, and then only wear it if television, the uncle that bought it, or Santa Claus come visit. Even myoelectric "bionic" arms are often worn that way: store them, only pull them out three times a year. Given that myoelectric control sucks, the arms break too soon anyway, that (rather than my work and private life related heavy) usage pattern is what the makers have in mind. However, I then wonder why they charge 5000 GBP (around 6500 USD) rather than 50 for the lot of one arm. I would go out of my way and pay 200 CHF for an arm I will wear just for show and tell - but for 6500 USD, you can get an actually useful body powered arm and I do wonder why one would not really want to do that. That one can go bicycle riding, real working, real gardening, really carrying grocery baskets, for real.